BBC homepage introduces embedded black'n'white television

Martin Belam
Written by
Published 12 October, 2007
Categories:

<< previous | next >>
1 comment so far
Add your comment

Without any fanfare whatsoever, the BBC's homepage started carrying embedded video for the first time today.

Video on the BBC homepage

It might seem like a done deal for the rest of the net - apparently there is this interweb thing called JoostTube or something - but having sat in the homepage's technical driving seat for a couple of years, I should imagine that the teeth-sucking about bandwidth and accessibility and so on was considerable.

And that's without anyone even considering whether it should have gone through a six month BBC Trust "Public Value Test" as a new service.

Two things immediately struck me about it. The first was the inclusion of a tiny DOG in the top-left corner which appeared to have squeezed into about 6 pixels the BBC logo and some product placement for the Columbia record label.

Dylan clip DOG

And secondly, the first ever moving images on the BBC homepage were in black and white. Presumably the colour service will come along later, perhaps following an announcement in the House of Commons like last time ;-)

1 comment so far

I saw this too, and thought.... oh, what an anti-climax.

Comments are closed across the site whilst I take a break. You can still contact me directly.

Search this site

Get free updates

Email icon   RSS icon
Sign up for email updates
  

Talks & presentations


Edinburgh International Science Festival

"Journalism in the digital age"
I'll be appearing on a panel with Sarah Hartley and Iain Hepburn at the Edinburgh International Science Festival on Sunday April 11th. More details...

Posts of the moment


Day of the Triffids opening sequence

Day of the Triffids
If everyone suddenly went blind, how long would the Internet survive, and could you still publish news on it?


The Express makes a twit of itself

With professionals of this quality, who needs 'citizen journalist' enemies?
It is hard to argue that ethics and quality set the 'professional journalist' apart from the amateur blogger, if the 'professional' keeps publishing articles so wrong that they have to be deleted.