With a week gone since Britain was put on a high state of terror alert, it is quite odd to reflect that I flew back to Walthamstow just as it became the centre of what was, briefly, the world's biggest news story.
In my wanderings around the borough I pass several of the houses that were raided, and there is still a large police presence and frequent over-flying by police helicopters in the area.
The equally large media presence, whether fair or foul, in some way seems to have increased the campainging that goes on in the borough. This week, for the first time that I've noticed, the Walthamstow Central area was leafleted about graphic allegations of atrocities in Sri Lanka. The leaflet came complete with some very grisly pictures of dead and injured school children. These were much stronger images than we are used to in the British press, although I've seen similar coverage of massacres like this in the press abroad. It certainly looks just like the kind of material designed to inflame local passions at a sensitive time.
The upside of course, is that on reflection I think I actually prefer my hometown to be best known as London's hotbed of alleged terrorism activity, rather than for it being best known as the birth place of teen boy band E17.
Search this site
Talks & presentations
"Journalism in the digital age"
I'll be appearing on a panel with Sarah Hartley and Iain Hepburn at the Edinburgh International Science Festival on Sunday April 11th. More details...
Posts of the moment
Day of the Triffids
If everyone suddenly went blind, how long would the Internet survive, and could you still publish news on it?
With professionals of this quality, who needs 'citizen journalist' enemies?
It is hard to argue that ethics and quality set the 'professional journalist' apart from the amateur blogger, if the 'professional' keeps publishing articles so wrong that they have to be deleted.
Read more about...
Also on the site
No comments yet