The Economist shows you how to shake up your offline marketing tracking

Martin Belam
Written by
Published 22 November, 2008
Categories:

<< previous | next >>
3 comments so far 
Add your comment Add your comment

At the recent Chinwag Live session I attended the focus was very much on ROI - something the web marketing channel is increasingly going to have prove in leaner economic times. It will become more and more important to track the success of marketing spend, which is why I still find it strange that not more marketing campaigns that involve a web component try and do this.

Take, for example, this campaign by For Goodness Shakes.

For Goodness Shakes tube campaign

There is considerable expense in running this. Firstly there is the cost of advertising on the tube, and secondly, the expense of sending out the vouchers and giving away the free sample product. However, all of the response to this advert is being funneled through the root domain of their website.

From a metrics point of view, they've no idea how much traffic their tube campaign alone is driving to the site - and without those figures they can't calculate an accurate ROI.

Far better to at least try and gather some data by using a landing page URL like forgoodnewssshakes.com/tube, or a micro-campaign site hosted on a specifically promotional domain like free-sport-shakes.com.

By contrast, this flyer for an offer from The Economist uses every offline tracking trick in the book.

The Economist offer

The offer has a specific landing page - www.economist.com/insert/uk/ - and a tracking code that the user needs to supply. Not only does that allow them to pin down take-up from this specific flyer, they've also merged the tracking across channels. If you opt to pick up the subscription over the phone, the same tracking code ensures that The Economist can get a great idea of exactly what response they got from this flyer.

3 comments so far

If I see an advert that interested me then I'll type the brand name into Google rather than remember whether the URL:

  • Is a .co.uk, .com, .net, .uk.com, .whatever
  • Has a subdomain (www, or not - the plonkers at royalmail.co.uk still don't point the non-www version to their site)
  • Has directories

If I use a search engine to find all my other content on the internet, then why should something that has caught my interest on an advert be any different?

But surely the point of the Economist ad is that you need a reference number to access the special offer.

Jason's approach may be common, but not amongst those offered a special discount if in possession of a special code.

Jason has a point--out of curiosity, I Googled "Economist magazine UK subscribe" and landed on a page that makes the same offer as the tube advert. So even though the tube may have motivated me to do the Google search, they won't know that. (However, I think in general you point about trying to track results is an excellent one.)

Leave your comment

A limited set of HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, strong, em, ul, li, blockquote
To protect against spam your comments will not appear on the site until I have manually published them.
Please don't 'keyword stuff' your name to promote your site.
Your email address will never appear on the site.
To get a picture icon that will appear here, and on many other sites, please visit Gravatar

  

  

  


Alan Turing wouldn't be impressed with this crude test, but please prove you are a person and type toothpaste into the box below.

Search this site

Get free updates


Email icon   RSS icon

Sign up for free email updates
  

Posts of the moment


Activate Logo

The Guardian's Activate 09
A series of posts with my notes and take-away quotes from the Activate 09 Summit.


Michael Jackson headlines

"Michael Jackson's death spares the BBC"
What would have been on Friday's front pages.


Martin Belam presenting at the Social Media Summit

How major publishers are using social media to drive traffic
An article based on my presentation at May's International Social Media Summit.