As luck would have it I am back in the UK for one of my favourite British events of the year - the mainstream media A-Level results frenzy.
Or as I've come to think of it - a load of journalists who haven't had to sit an academic exam for years denigrating the hard efforts of a load of children who are emotionally at the age where they are probably least equipped to deal with failure in front of their peers and parents.
I've written about it all before of course, and the two things that really bug me. One the inability to move the debate about education away from a simple number-crunching of pass rates and grades to prove either that the system is dumbing down when results go up, or the education system is failing if results go down. And secondly the continual use of positive images of girls having exam success and boys being the face of exam failure.
I was reminded of all this because with a full week to go until the results are announced, yesterday's Evening Standard carried an editorial bemoaning the fact that children were taking "soft" A-Levels, naming "statistics, chemisty and physics" as the 'hardest' GCSE subjects, and saying that the trend away from taking these subjects can also be seen at A-Level.
There has been more coverage of this report around the press today as well, notably looking at the drop-off in the number of people taking physics at A-Level. This is of course seen as a complete disaster for British society. "What kind of grip are we going to have on the world if we do not understand its physical structure?" bemoans one of the authors of the study, Professor Smithers.
Looking at the comparison of the figures between 2000 and 2005, I had some ideas of the stories that could have been written based on the figures, if the press weren't obsessed with the knee-jerk doom'n'gloom that education isn't what it was back in my day etc etc.
Search this site
Talks & presentations
"Journalism in the digital age"
I'll be appearing on a panel with Sarah Hartley and Iain Hepburn at the Edinburgh International Science Festival on Sunday April 11th. More details...
Posts of the moment
Day of the Triffids
If everyone suddenly went blind, how long would the Internet survive, and could you still publish news on it?
With professionals of this quality, who needs 'citizen journalist' enemies?
It is hard to argue that ethics and quality set the 'professional journalist' apart from the amateur blogger, if the 'professional' keeps publishing articles so wrong that they have to be deleted.
Read more about...
Also on the site
2 comments so far
There was a piece in the Guardian recently about how they're (finally) doing a small scale trial of delivering the results (and in some case, a copy of the fully marked paper) electronically.
http://media.guardian.co.uk/newmedia/story/0,,1834033,00.html
Rather takes away some of the excitement in my opinion, but there you go.
Good idea mate, great article as well.I have a question, Just wondering ... If the tories take over in the next general election, do you think our education system will get more efficient ?Thanks