London phone numbers change again, according to the Daily Mail
I've written about this before, but yesterday the Daily Mail again reported the inaccurate claim that "London is to have its fourth telephone number shake-up in 14 years"
Sean Poulter's article states that:
In 2000, London codes were changed again to 0207 for inner and 0208 for outer London.
David Edmonds, who was the head of telecoms regulator OFTEL at the time, said this system was 'as future proof as possible' and there would be no need for any more changes for a generation
That simply isn't true. In 2000 the London code was changed to 020. The London code is remaining as 020. All that is changing is that now some numbers will be 020 3xxx xxxx, whereas until now all the 020 numbers have started either with a 7 or 8. David Edmonds is right - the system was future proofed - that is exactly why OFCOM can now start issuing (020) 3 numbers to boost the capacity of London's network without anybody having to change any exisiting numbers.
Of course the Mail even manages to drag out a rent-a-quote, David Bishop from the Federation of Small Businesses to spout that:
It really is shocking that we face a major change again
No, David, that isn't what is shocking about this "story".
Posted by Martin Belam, May 21, 2005
Read more posts on currybetdotnet about: Daily Mail, OFCOM
The views expressed on currybetdotnet are my own, and do not reflect the views of my current or former employers.
Search
Download e-books
About Martin Belam
I'm a London-based internet consultant and writer, with 8 years experience in product management, information architecture, and user experience design for global brands like Sony, Vodafone, The Guardian and the BBC. I specialise in advising on search, widgets, RSS, online news publishing and bulk email delivery.
Martin Belam CV
email: martin.belam@currybet.net
tel: +44 (0) 7801 828718
twitter: currybet
About Martin Belam and this site
Recent posts
- The Economist shows you how to shake up your offline marketing tracking
- Taking the 'Ooh' out of Google: Getting site search right - Part 12
- The Financial Times and "the worst online redesign I have ever seen"
- Taking the 'Ooh' out of Google: Getting site search right - Part 11
- Another threat to local newspapers - daily BBC horoscopes by email!
Recent links
Recent comments
Popular posts
- Protecting the identity of Baby P's killers: The courts vs the people vs the Internet
- Day #2 at Guardian Hack Day
- The BBC News linking policy is simply clumsy, not 'greedy'
- BBC fails the online Brand damage limitation test
- "The Former Scottish Constituency of Northumbria"
- Social media and www.bbc.co.uk
- Take-away facts and quotes from the 2008 Euro IA Summit in Amsterdam - Part 1
- Measuring UK newspaper success with social media
Popular categories
BBC, Doctor Who, Ghost Walks, Media, Music, Newspapers, Search, Social media, Web
Contact: martin dot belam at currybet dot net
©2008 Martin Belam where appropriate. Powered by Movable Type. Hosted by Bytemark.
Manufactured in Great Britain.
1 comment so far
Um: I remember also seeing this exact same story in November on BBC London news...