I've got no qualms with the News International corporate site claiming that each of their newspapers is a leader in their field - the audience figures speak for themselves, especially in print.
I just wonder, if I'd been putting the banner graphic together, whether I'd have picked The Sun's thoroughly debunked "UFO hits wind turbine" front page as the image to set against the claim of 'world-class journalism'...
Search this site
Posts of the moment
Day of the Triffids
If everyone suddenly went blind, how long would the Internet survive, and could you still publish news on it?
With professionals of this quality, who needs 'citizen journalist' enemies?
It is hard to argue that ethics and quality set the 'professional journalist' apart from the amateur blogger, if the 'professional' keeps publishing articles so wrong that they have to be deleted.
Read more about...
Also on the site
5 comments so far
Haha I don't think they could have picked a worse title! Unless they have one involving Elvis or Bigfoot perhaps.
Thanks for the laugh!
Wow, UFO news in frontpage. It's a good promotion for alien..:).
Anything can be a ufo if it can't be identified, it doesn't mean its an alien object.
Indeed, but if you read the original story talking about a "massive ball of light with tentacles going right down to the ground", the implication is very clear that this is the work of little anti-green men.
The Sun certainly is a leader in its field, that being sensationalist rubbish. Therefore I see no problem with the banner !!
I suppose it can be a fun read occasionally when you find a copy in the barbers.