DCMS publishes BBC Charter Review responses

Martin Belam
Written by
Published 16 February, 2004
Categories: ,

<< previous | next >>
No comments yet
Add your comment

As a member of BBC staff I didn't think it appropriate to submit my thoughts to the DCMS Charter Review consultation - although I suppose as a Licence Fee payer and a voter I probably should of. The DCMS has had over 1,300 responses, and on its website has now published a selection. I've only looked through some of them on one page so far - 'H' - but it is fascinating stuff. Already I've come across such diverse suggestions and opinions as:

  • Rent out or sell off Broadcasting House, Television Centre and Bush House, and then move into the regions to cut costs
  • A single issue complaint about one BBC Breakfast item on hunting with dogs
  • That the BBC should concentrate on quality rather than quantity
  • That the BBC should pay more attention to sexuality issues
  • That the BBC should provide an annual survey with the television licence bill
  • That one viewer stopped watching the BBC six months ago because of increasing on-screen male nudity
  • That commercial funding of the BBC is an "anathema"
  • That the BBC has developed a great website which is full of great and helpful information

I agreed with the last point anyway. I shall probably come back to this when I've had a chance to look through it a bit more thoroughly...

No comments yet
Comments are closed across the site whilst I take a break. You can still contact me directly.

Search this site

Get free updates

Email icon   RSS icon
Sign up for email updates
  

Talks & presentations


Edinburgh International Science Festival

"Journalism in the digital age"
I'll be appearing on a panel with Sarah Hartley and Iain Hepburn at the Edinburgh International Science Festival on Sunday April 11th. More details...

Posts of the moment


Day of the Triffids opening sequence

Day of the Triffids
If everyone suddenly went blind, how long would the Internet survive, and could you still publish news on it?


The Express makes a twit of itself

With professionals of this quality, who needs 'citizen journalist' enemies?
It is hard to argue that ethics and quality set the 'professional journalist' apart from the amateur blogger, if the 'professional' keeps publishing articles so wrong that they have to be deleted.