Thursday's Daily Mail editorial titled "Betrayal of our fighting troops" quotes the revelation from the National Audit Office that:
"troops were indeed sent into battle without proper protection from chemical or biological attack"
I can't help thinking that the complaint would carry more authority if anyone could produce evidence that the chemical or biological weapons they required protection from actually existed.
Search this site
Talks & presentations
"Journalism in the digital age"
I'll be appearing on a panel with Sarah Hartley and Iain Hepburn at the Edinburgh International Science Festival on Sunday April 11th. More details...
Posts of the moment
Day of the Triffids
If everyone suddenly went blind, how long would the Internet survive, and could you still publish news on it?
With professionals of this quality, who needs 'citizen journalist' enemies?
It is hard to argue that ethics and quality set the 'professional journalist' apart from the amateur blogger, if the 'professional' keeps publishing articles so wrong that they have to be deleted.
Read more about...
Also on the site
No comments yet