Newmediazero has published another one of those web traffic stories where the figures don't add up. The headline is that "US news sites attract British users seeking Iraq war latest". But the figures they quote don't seem to have any clarity on geo-location. The large rise in users to CNN.com and news.google.com are the given reasons for this. Yet they give usage figures for news.google.com which are a tenth of the usage figures they give for BBC News Online. Which doesn't square with the headline in my - obvious vested interest - book. I don't see in those numbers that more British people were looking at U.S. websites.
The article goes on to report that:
The news sector as a whole has benefited from surfers' thirst for war news, recording a unique audience of 6,038,147 for March, up 26% on the previous month, say figures from Nielsen//NetRatings
And then says that "the most popular newspaper site with 11,335,818 users" is guardianunlimited. So nearly twice as much as the figure quoted for the 'news' sector as a whole? Now, I love mediamonkey as much as the next new media geek, but if Newmediazero are claiming these are UK usage figures it implies that more people in this country read the Guardian Online than the 3.5 million that buy The Sun in print. Er, hello?
Search
Download e-books
About Martin Belam
I'm a London-based internet consultant and writer, with 8 years experience in product management, information architecture, and user experience design for global brands like Sony, Vodafone, The Guardian and the BBC. I specialise in advising on search, widgets, RSS, online news publishing and bulk email delivery.
Martin Belam CV
email: martin.belam@currybet.net
tel: +44 (0) 7801 828718
twitter: currybet
About Martin Belam and this site
Recent posts
Recent links
Recent comments
Popular posts
Popular categories
BBC, Doctor Who, Ghost Walks, Media, Music, Newspapers, Search, Social media, Web
1 comment so far
Oh dear, there they go again...