One Prince = c.100 People

Martin Belam
Written by
Published 16 July, 2007
Categories:

<< previous | next >>
No comments yet
Add your comment

Well Carol, as you say, there was an incident at 11,500 feet above Newbury in Berkshire, on the morning of Wednesday the 24th of March, and these details have been reported in the briefest of detail on the CAA website. It says, and I quote, "an aircraft proximity report has been filed". Now, this is a report I understand where safety was or could have been compromised. And this is an aircraft proximity report between a military aircraft and an A321 which is an Airbus. Now what we've learned this evening was that that the Prince of Wales, Prince Charles, was actually on board that military jet. As you say he was heading to Spain to represent Britain there, at the memorial service for the victims of the Atocha rail bombings. He apparently was informed of the incident afterwards, although he was unaware of it happening at the time. And equally worrying on board that Airbus heading into Heathrow were more than a hundred passengers.

Nick Thatcher, BBC News 24, 00:14, Friday 16th July

Equally worrying?

No comments yet
Comments are closed across the site whilst I take a break. You can still contact me directly.

Search this site

Get free updates

Email icon   RSS icon
Sign up for email updates
  

Talks & presentations


Edinburgh International Science Festival

"Journalism in the digital age"
I'll be appearing on a panel with Sarah Hartley and Iain Hepburn at the Edinburgh International Science Festival on Sunday April 11th. More details...

Posts of the moment


Day of the Triffids opening sequence

Day of the Triffids
If everyone suddenly went blind, how long would the Internet survive, and could you still publish news on it?


The Express makes a twit of itself

With professionals of this quality, who needs 'citizen journalist' enemies?
It is hard to argue that ethics and quality set the 'professional journalist' apart from the amateur blogger, if the 'professional' keeps publishing articles so wrong that they have to be deleted.